WEATHER — / —
2024-099 · ZONING · POLICY · 2024

An Ordinance to Amend the Amesbury Zoning Ordinances to Adopt a Limit on the Number of Cannabis Retail Licenses to be Issued within the Retail Marijuana Overlay District (RMOD).

Amends the Amesbury Zoning Ordinances to cap the number of adult-use cannabis retailers in the RMOD at 40% of the city’s alcohol licenses, with a minimum of two licenses. Aims to balance downtown activity with regulated cannabis access.

approved CITYWIDEBUSINESS DISTRICT
  1. STEP 1
    Submitted
    JUL 23 2024
  2. STEP 2 · CURRENT
    Approved
    DEC 10 2024
AI summary · plain-language

This ordinance amends the Amesbury Zoning Ordinances to implement a cap on the number of licensed adult-use cannabis retailers operating within the Retail Marijuana Overlay District (RMOD). The cap is set at 40% of the city’s licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages not to be drunk on the premises, with fractions rounded up to the next whole number and a mandatory minimum of two licenses. The measure is intended to regulate cannabis retail growth while supporting downtown economic activity and alignment with local planning goals. It was developed with input from City Administration, legal counsel, the Chamber of Commerce, the Economic Incentives Committee, and the Office of Community and Economic Development.

Generated by an LLM. Not legal text. Read the official ordinance for binding language.

Key provisions

§1 Caps Adult Use Marijuana Retail Establishments in the RMOD at 40% of the city’s alcohol licenses (not to be drunk on premises).
§2 Calculations use licenses for off-premise alcohol sales under GL c.138, §15, rounding any fraction up to the next whole number.
§3 Minimum number of allowed retail cannabis licenses is two (2).
§4 Amends the Zoning Ordinances to implement the limit in the RMOD.

Discussed at meetings

City Council**REVISED** City Council MeetingDecember 10, 2024
amend2024-099
Amend the amendment currently on the floor, by changing the word "issued" to "allowed," and by striking the last sentence, "The minimum number of allowed retail licenses shall be two (2)."
MOVED BY COUNCILOR GILDAY · SECONDED BY COUNCILOR WHEELER · VOTE: PASSED VIA ROLL CALL 6-3
amend2024-099
(Roll-call vote on the amendment, as amended)
VOTE: PASSED VIA ROLL CALL 7-2
approve2024-099
Accept 2024-099, as amended.
MOVED BY COUNCILOR WHEELER · SECONDED BY COUNCILOR STANGANELLI · VOTE: PASSED VIA ROLL CALL 6-3 (COUNCILORS HOGG, RINALDI, AND WHEELER VOTED AGAINST)
City CouncilCity Council MeetingOctober 22, 2024
2024-099Ordinance — Cannabis Retail License Limits (2024-099)
City CouncilOrdinance & Administration Committee MeetingOctober 21, 2024
approve2024-099
Councilor Rinaldi moved to return 2024-099 to the full City Council with a positive recommendation.
MOVED BY COUNCILOR RINALDI · SECONDED BY COUNCILOR GILDAY · VOTE: PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (2-0)
2024-0992024-099 An Ordinance to amend the Cannabis Retail License Limits – Councilors Stanganelli and Rinaldi Sponsors
City CouncilCity Council Planning and Development Committee MeetingOctober 16, 2024
other2024-099
Motion to return 2024-099 to the full City Council with a positive recommendation.
MOVED BY COUNCILOR HOGG · SECONDED BY COUNCILOR MANDEVILLE · VOTE: PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (2-0)
2024-0992024-099 — Ordinance to amend Cannabis Retail License limits
City CouncilOrdinance and Administration Committee MeetingSeptember 16, 2024
2024-0992024-099
Planning BoardPlanning BoardSeptember 9, 2024
approve2024-099
Send a positive recommendation for Bill 2024-099 to City Council.
MOVED BY LORRI KREBS · SECONDED BY KEITH RATNER · VOTE: MOTION PASSED 5-0
Bill 2024-099 - Zoning Amendment
Planning BoardPlanning BoardAugust 12, 2024
Bill 2024-099 - Zoning Amendment
City CouncilREVISED City Council MeetingJuly 23, 2024
refer2024-099
Refer 2024-099 An Ordinance to amend the Cannabis Retail License Limits to Ordinance & Administration, the Planning Board, and Planning & Development Subcommittee with a second reading on Sept 24 and request for a presentation from the administration.
MOVED BY STEVE STANGANELLI · SECONDED BY MICHAEL HOGG · VOTE: REFERRED (FINAL VOTE 7-0 WITH 1 ABSTENTION)